What is infrared photography?

The short answer

Infrared photography is photography made with near-infrared light — wavelengths of roughly 700 to 900 nanometres, just past the red end of human vision. Digital camera sensors are naturally sensitive to it, but every stock camera has a hot-mirror filter over the sensor that blocks it. Remove or bypass that filter and living foliage records as brilliant white, clear sky records near-black, and haze mostly disappears. Getting there takes either a converted camera or a very long exposure with a screw-on infrared filter on an unconverted body.

Everything on this page comes from shooting infrared on ten converted bodies — a Nikon D70 at 590nm and 720nm, a D60 at 590nm, a D200, D300 and D40X at 720nm, a D750 at 665nm, a Z7II at 720nm and 850nm, a full-spectrum Z7II used with lens filters, and a full-spectrum Canon 40D. The frames used to illustrate it are my own, and each one is labelled with the camera and wavelength it was made on.

False-colour infrared photograph of still water framed by magenta foliage, made at 665nm
Monsanto Chemical Ponds — Maury County, TN, 665nm

How infrared photography works

A silicon sensor responds to light from roughly 350nm to 1100nm — well past what the eye handles. Manufacturers glue a hot mirror in front of it so colours look normal. Infrared work is the deliberate removal of that restriction, then the deliberate exclusion of visible light with a filter chosen for its cut-on wavelength: the point below which light is blocked.

The famous white-foliage effect is the Wood effect: healthy leaves reflect near-infrared strongly because their internal cell structure scatters it rather than absorbing it the way chlorophyll absorbs visible red and blue. Water absorbs infrared, so rivers and lakes go dark. Blue sky scatters very little infrared, so it goes deep or black. That combination — glowing trees against dark water and dark sky — is the entire visual signature.

Terms worth defining before you go further

Near-infrared (NIR)
Light from about 700nm to 1100nm. This is what photographic infrared uses. It is not thermal imaging, which works far further out in the spectrum and needs a completely different sensor.
Hot mirror
The internal filter over a stock sensor that blocks infrared. A conversion removes it.
Cut-on wavelength
The number on the filter — 590nm, 665nm, 720nm, 850nm. Light shorter than that number is blocked. Lower numbers keep more visible colour; compare all four here.
Full spectrum
A conversion with clear glass instead of an IR filter, so the body sees ultraviolet, visible and infrared and you choose the look with an external or clip-in filter. Full-spectrum guide.
False colour
The pink/teal or gold/blue palette you get from lower cut-ons after a red–blue channel swap in post. How that swap is done.
Hotspot
A bright, washed-out circle in the centre of the frame caused by internal reflections in some lenses under infrared light. Hotspot guide.

What you actually need to start

  1. A body to convert. An older second body is the usual choice, because the conversion is permanent unless you pay to reverse it. See which cameras suit infrared.
  2. A wavelength decision. 665nm or 720nm covers most people; the comparison guide walks through the trade-offs.
  3. A lens that behaves. Some otherwise excellent lenses hotspot badly. Test yours first.
  4. A raw workflow. Infrared files look wrong until you set a custom white balance and process them — step-by-step here.
See the recommended conversion service → (affiliate link, opens in a new tab)

Affiliate link — I use Kolari conversions and filters myself; see the affiliate disclosure.

Common questions

Is infrared photography the same as thermal imaging?

No. Photographic infrared records reflected near-infrared light, roughly 700–900nm, using a normal silicon sensor. Thermal imaging records emitted heat in the long-wave infrared band and needs a dedicated thermal sensor. A converted camera cannot see heat.

Can I shoot infrared without converting a camera?

Yes, but with limits. A screw-on 720nm filter on an unconverted body works because the hot mirror leaks a little infrared — the cost is exposures measured in seconds to minutes, a tripod, and no usable viewfinder. It is a fair way to test whether you like the look before committing a body.

Does infrared photography work in the dark?

Not on its own. Near-infrared photography needs an infrared light source, and in practice that source is the sun. Overcast days give weak, flat results; bright midday sun with foliage is the ideal condition — the opposite of visible-light landscape advice.

What time of day is best for infrared?

Late morning through mid-afternoon in full sun. Every frame in the archive shot in harsh light would have been a poor visible-light photograph at the same hour.

Does infrared conversion damage the camera?

It does not damage it, but it does change it permanently. Autofocus is recalibrated for the new filter, and the body no longer shoots normal colour. Reversal is possible at a conversion service, at roughly the cost of another conversion.